Intelligent Design Versus Evolution

Intelligent Design Versus Evolution Teaching intelligent design or creationism in public schools has been acontroversial subject for the past century in the United States. Many people believe thatonly the evolution theory should be taught. Intelligent design should not be taught inpublic schools because it is not based on evidence. Learning creationism in school willbreak the law, harm science and harm students learning about science.Teaching intelligent design in public schools will break the law. The firstamendment states that Congress is prohibited to make any law respecting anestablishment of religion; therefore, you cannot teach creationism in schools. There havebeen many cases of schools breaking laws in order to teach creationism; if the schoolsdon't want to break the law then they shouldn't teach intelligent design to their students.Intelligent shouldn't be taught in public schools because it is religious and is notpractical for daily life. Intelligent design is the belief that a supernatural intelligence hascr eated the universe and humankind. The definition of evolution is that a developmentalprocess in which an organ or organism becomes more and more complex bydifferentiation of its parts. Evidence has shown that an animal that has stronger genes tosurvive in their environment can live longer than other animals that don't have the genes.After a while, the animals that lived on will sometimes develop certain characteristics ontheir bodies, which could make it easier and better for fitting to their environment.Intelligent design is only a belief that the world today was created for a reason andeverything that we see was designed for a purpose. Most schools today only teach theevolution theory which makes it more practical for daily life. Most people also believethe evolution theory. The US News and World Report has made a...The ligne is still used by French and Swiss watchm...

An Idealized Model in Physics

An Idealized Model in Physics I once heard an acronym for the best pieces of physics advice I ever got: Keep It Simple, Stupid (KISS). In physics, we are typically dealing with a system that is, in reality, very complex. For an example, lets consider one of the easiest physical systems to analyze: throwing a ball. Idealized Model of Throwing a Tennis Ball You throw a tennis ball into the air and it comes back, and you want to analyze its motion. How complex is this? The ball isnt perfectly round, for one thing; it has that weird fuzzy stuff on it. How does that affect its motion? How windy is it? Did you put a little bit of spin on the ball when you threw it? Almost certainly. All of these things can have an impact on the motion of the ball through the air. And those are the obvious ones! As it goes up, its weight actually changes slightly, based on its distance from the center of the Earth. And the Earth is rotating, so perhaps that will have some bearing on the relative motion of the ball. If the Suns out, then theres light hitting the ball, which may have energy repercussions. Both the Sun and the Moon have gravitational effects on the tennis ball, so should those be taken into account? What about Venus? We quickly see this spiraling out of control. Theres just too much going on in the world for me to figure out how all of it impacts on me throwing the tennis ball? What can we do? Use in Physics In physics, a model (or idealized model) is a simplified version of the physical system that strips away the unnecessary aspects of the situation. One thing that we dont typically worry about is the physical size of the object, nor really its structure. In the tennis ball example, we treat it as a simple point object and ignore the fuzziness. Unless its something were specifically interested in, well also ignore the fact that its spinning. Air resistance is frequently ignored, as is wind. The gravity influences of the Sun, Moon, and other heavenly bodies are ignored, as is the impact of light on the surface of the ball. Once all of these unnecessary distractions are stripped away, you can then begin focusing on the exact qualities of the situation that youre interested in examining. To analyze the motion of a tennis ball, that would typically be the displacements, velocities, and gravity forces involved. Using Care With Idealized Models The most important thing in working with an idealized model is to make sure that the things youre stripping away are things that are not necessary for your analysis. The features that are necessary will be determined by the hypothesis that youre considering.   If youre studying angular momentum, the spin of an object is essential; if youre studying 2-dimensional kinematics, it may be able to ignore it. If youre throwing a tennis ball from an airplane at high altitude, you may want to take into account wind resistance, to see if the ball hits a terminal velocity and stops accelerating. Alternately, you may want to analyze the variability of gravity in such a situation, depending on the level of precision you need. When creating an idealized model, make sure that the things youre eliminating are traits that you actually want to eliminate from your model. Carelessly ignoring an important element isnt a model; its a mistake. Edited by Anne Marie Helmenstine, Ph.D.